Multi-agent orchestration

Assign specialist agents separately. Hand off and review their files deliberately.

Assign research and writing separately; have a person check versions, pass the shared brief, and accept the result.

Buda gives each Agent a persistent workspace and provides Space Drive for shared files. A person assigns the next task and checks the handoff; Buda does not automatically orchestrate every Agent.

✓ Clear specialist roles✓ A traceable deliverable✓ A named human reviewer
The gap

More agents do not automatically mean one coordinated result

The cost of a multi-agent process is the space between assignments: missing source links, incompatible versions, and decisions nobody owns.

01 — The brief diverges

A research Agent finds new information, but the drafting Agent works from an older prompt.

02 — Output loses its context

The final copy arrives without the source trail, assumptions, or outstanding questions.

03 — Approval is ambiguous

The team mistakes an Agent completing its task for a person approving publication.

Human-led handoff · illustration Specialist handoffs
≋ Source brief prepared
▤ Draft for channel
↕ Claims checked
▧ Human acceptance
□ Next-run checklist
✓
One accountable handoff

Each specialist prepares a named artifact. A person checks the brief, claims, and next action before anything is sent.

What Buda provides

A workspace for responsibilities, not an invisible swarm

Use Agent sessions and files to inspect work, and deliberately place shared material in Space Drive. A person checks the version and access scope before assigning another Agent; this is not built-in automatic orchestration.

AI Specialist agent team
Research Writing Checking Review

Specialists with boundaries

Separate research, writing, and checking roles. Each Agent has its own sessions and working files; verify access before sharing any Space resource.

Define the job →
Illustrative file list 3 example files
Artifact Stage Review
Source brief Example draft Check manually
Channel draft Example file Check manually
Claim check Example file Review

Evidence beside the draft

Request a brief, source links, draft files, and unresolved questions in the task. Open the files to verify them; Buda does not automatically assemble a handoff packet.

Inspect the handoff →
▦Source links
▤Approved brief
▰Agent sessions
▧Draft files
▥Decision notes

Tools with an owner

Use Drive to keep artifacts, and Browser, Terminal, or Git where the task warrants inspection. A human decides whether the result is ready for an external action.

Review before action →

Illustrative workflow and file list—not Buda UI, a built-in queue, or automatic approval states.

Capabilities

Six handoffs in a customer-update workflow

These are separately assigned Agent tasks with human-led file handoffs, not an automatic orchestration or approval chain built into Buda.

01 / Human

Set the assignment

Name the audience, confirmed facts, deadline, claims to avoid, and publication owner.

Review packet
✓ One shared brief
✓ Source policy
✓ Acceptance checklist
02 / Research

Collect verifiable evidence

Gather primary links, dates, quotations, and open questions; flag any claim you could not check.

Review packet
✓ Source ledger
✓ Fact / inference split
✓ Unresolved claims
03 / Handoff

Transfer only approved context

Place an approved brief in Space Drive. Have a person share the path and version with the next Agent; private Agent Drives are not automatically shared.

Review packet
✓ Permission check
✓ Brief version
✓ Named owner
04 / Writing

Draft for the actual channel

Produce a reviewable customer update with citations or links back to the brief, plus a list of deliberate omissions.

Review packet
✓ Channel draft
✓ Claims map
✓ Open questions
05 / Review

Check claims before sending

A person tests the draft against the verified brief, returns corrections, and owns the publication decision.

Review packet
✓ Correction notes
✓ Approved version
✓ Publication decision
06 / Reuse

Keep the next run cheaper

Store the accepted brief and checklist. Note where the handoff broke so the next run improves rather than merely repeats.

Review packet
✓ Reusable checklist
✓ Version history
✓ Exception log
Pilot plan

Pilot one handoff, then measure the rework

Do not start by creating a fleet. Use one customer update or internal briefing with two Agents and a person who owns acceptance.

1. Set the boundary

Pick a low-risk deliverable and an owner. List the sources Agents may read and the actions they may not take.

2. Run and inspect

Research Agent prepares evidence; writing Agent uses the approved brief. Inspect output files, source links, and unresolved claims.

3. Judge the result

Compare correction time, missing evidence, and the number of back-and-forth handoffs to the previous process.

4. Expand carefully

Add another specialist only if it removes a real bottleneck without obscuring accountability.

Safer by design

Human orchestration still matters

Buda makes sessions and artifacts visible, but default autopilot does not pause every tool call for approval. If work must be reviewed before sending, restrict tool access and use a human sending step or a verified external approval flow. Record-level review and merge belong to a separate system such as Busabase ChangeRequests.

Keep the boundary clear
Agent prepares → person reviews
External action → explicit authorization
Formal record write → audited review path
FAQ

Multi-agent orchestration: common questions

Does Buda automatically coordinate all agents?

No. Assignments, context sharing, permissions, and acceptance criteria must be designed for the workflow.

Are Agent Drives automatically shared?

No. Distinguish individual Agent Drive from Space-level resources and confirm the access scope before a handoff.

How many agents should a team start with?

Use the smallest number that makes roles clearer: often two specialists plus one named human reviewer.

What is the output of the pilot?

A verified source brief, a reviewable draft, an unresolved-question list, and a recorded human decision.

Can Buda enforce approval before every tool call?

Do not assume so. Tool behavior varies; put consequential actions behind explicit permissions and process checks.

Is this different from an AI Agent Workspace page?

Yes. This page is about assigning and reviewing work across specialist Agents; the Workspace page explains the general product surface.

Start with one human-led file handoff

Assign research and writing separately; have a person check versions, pass the shared brief, and accept the result.

Start with Buda →

Explore the related Buda workspace guide